G2G
Government-to-government
A bilateral agreement between governments sets the legal and diplomatic basis. DefenceExporter supports delivery as a technical partner under that agreement.
Government Partnerships
Defence workforce programmes touch the most sensitive responsibilities of the state. Every DefenceExporter partnership concept is therefore designed as a journey with explicit decision gates — where governments decide, and where a programme can stop.
Discuss a Government Programme01 — The programme journey
Each stage produces a defined deliverable. No stage begins until the government has passed the gate before it.
The government defines the workforce need, its priorities and constraints.
DeliverableStatement of requirement
GateGovernment confirms the need
Defence, immigration, labour, human-rights and data-protection law reviewed in every jurisdiction.
DeliverableLegal and policy assessment
GateLawful basis confirmed — or the programme stops
Streams, scale, phasing and the balance of active, reserve and specialist roles.
DeliverableProgramme architecture
GateArchitecture approved
Authorised channels, eligibility criteria and fair-recruitment safeguards.
DeliverableRecruitment framework
GateChannels authorised
Authorised providers, curricula mapped to standards and certification routes.
DeliverableTraining and certification framework
GateProviders authorised
Secure platform configuration under government control and data-residency rules.
DeliverableConfigured secure platform
GateSecurity and data-protection review passed
Phased delivery, beginning with a pilot and explicit criteria for scaling.
DeliverablePilot and phased rollout
GatePilot review before any expansion
Reporting, audit, grievance mechanisms and agreed exit arrangements.
DeliverableGovernance and oversight framework
GateContinuous oversight
02 — Partnership structures
G2G
A bilateral agreement between governments sets the legal and diplomatic basis. DefenceExporter supports delivery as a technical partner under that agreement.
B2G
A government engages DefenceExporter for defined services — programme design, technology or training management — through its procurement processes.
Multi-party
Two or more governments, with delivery partners, agree a shared framework. The 1947 Tripartite Agreement between the United Kingdom, India and Nepal on Gurkha service is a long-standing example of this kind of structure.
03 — Commercial structure
The potential commercial structure is organised around eight service lines. No fixed prices have been established; each engagement would be scoped with the government concerned.
| Service line | Engagement type | Indicative basis |
|---|---|---|
| Government programme design | Advisory & design | Fixed-scope or phased engagement |
| Recruitment infrastructure | Service delivery | Scoped per programme |
| Training management | Coordination | Scoped per programme |
| Technology licensing | Licence | Licence and support agreement |
| Workforce management | Managed service | Scoped per programme |
| Screening / verification services | Service delivery | Scoped per programme |
| Consultancy | Advisory | Scoped engagement |
| Training centre management | Managed service | Scoped per facility |
Candidates are never charged recruitment fees. Programme costs are borne by the contracting government or governments under transparent, auditable arrangements.
04 — Principles
Governments retain every decision of authority — selection, appointment, command and activation.
Scope, responsibilities and funding defined in writing and open to oversight bodies.
Clear lines of responsibility, independent audit and accessible grievance channels.
Agreed arrangements for ending a programme safely, including for the individuals involved.
Conversations are confidential and create no obligation. Submitting an enquiry does not constitute a partnership or contractual commitment.